Unlike the Court of Appeals in San Diego, which issued this opinion (thanks to How Appealing for the link), I have serious doubts that banning pornographic pictures has any rational relation to reduction of sexual harassment of female correction officers. In fact, it will probably achieve the opposite effect. I think the prison is struck by the same flash of "brilliance" that caused some governments in the past to try to "cure" homosexuality by imposing prison sentences on gay men.
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court clarifies diversity jurisdiction rules
- Ninth Circuit weighs in on the dispute regarding copyright to Eisenhower war memoirs
- Appellate court finds jury should have been instructed with the federal regulation requiring commercial truckers to use extreme caution in bad road conditions
- Trials on Videotape
- Protection of Animal Rights in Rome
- 9th Circuit declares Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 148.6 unconstitutional
- Published opinions: quality over quantity.
- Is it ever too late for an apology?
- Maryland v. Blake
- State appeals court in San Francisco finds due process violation in denial of parole
Law.com Newswire
SCOTUSblog
NYT > Home Page
Slate Magazine
Tip Jar
Change is good
« Sometimes, "payment in full" isn't really payment in full | Main | First Amendment and web logs - take 2 »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Comments