« "Best Interests of the Child" apparently means Mo' $$$ | Main | 9th Circuit holds military stop-loss policy does not violate terms of enlistment contract or Due Process »



Why does your headline say that the Court has "accept[ed]" the case(s) for review? The petitions have just been filed and it's quite possible they'll be denied.


you are absolutely correct, I goofed. The headline should have referenced the filed petitions, the review questions have not been considered and it is not at all clear whether the Court is going to grant review.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad